Ph.D. Candidate in Economics University of Michigan 2026–27 Job Market Candidate
I focus on questions that sit within the union of macroeconomics,
international trade, and development. I use both structural and
empirical tools to study how globalization, domestic frictions, and
government policy interact with economic growth and distribution.
Abstract: This paper shows that trade integration
and financial constraints can make specialization history-dependent even
when sectors have the same long-run productivity potential. When their
long-run potentials differ, the same constraints slow the adjustment of
production towards comparative advantage. I study these mechanisms in a
dynamic multisector general equilibrium model with heterogeneous
entrepreneurs facing persistent productivity shocks. Financial frictions
make firms’ ability to expand depend on their wealth, which connects
sectoral production and growth to wealth distribution. In a closed
economy, relative prices respond to scarcity: initially disadvantaged
sectors become more profitable and catch up with initially favored
sectors. In an open economy, international markets limit this price
response; initially favored sectors accumulate more wealth and account
for larger long-run shares of production. I conduct a quantitative
analysis using data on Peruvian firms, households, national accounts,
tariffs, and international trade. The quantitative results confirm that
in an environment with empirically informed features, financial
frictions slow sectoral reallocation towards comparative advantage, and
greater trade exposure reinforces the degree to which initial
accumulation advantages translate into subsequent specialization.
Other Current Research
“Government Spending Multipliers and Distribution of
Commodity Booms in the Spatial Economy” Latest Version
(February, 2025) | RSIE
Discussion Paper 690Abstract
This paper studies the effects of local government spending and examines
an empirical puzzle: while income, wages, and household expenditure rise
following spending increases,local employment and firm value added do
not. I exploit plausibly exogenous variation in public investment
spending in Peru, where a commodity boom in the 2000s and ex ante
defined natural resource revenue-sharing rules generated resources
windfalls to local governments even to non-extractive provinces. Using
these transfers as an instrument for public investment purchases, I
estimate an open-economy relative local multiplier of 0.376. To explain
the disconnect between rises in wages, expenditures, and income gains,
and no response in local production, I propose a spatial transmission
mechanism: government spending raises local demand, which is met through
trade with other regions rather than only local production. I formalize
this mechanism in a spatial trade model, where local fiscal shocks
propagate through goods market linkages. The model’s equilibrium
conditions map to a Spatial Auto-Regressive (SAR) specification, which I
estimate to quantify indirect effects. The SAR results confirm that
trade spillovers substantially amplify the aggregate effects of local
spending. These findings imply that local multiplier estimates, which do
not incorporate spatial propagation, likely understate the broader
economic impact of fiscal policy.
“Teenage Labor, Trade, and Market Access” Preliminary Results Available by
RequestAbstract
This paper studies how, due to incomplete markets and limited
labor-market access, child and teenage labor can remain persistent
during periods of rapid aggregate growth The paper combines household
survey data with district-level exposure to trade shocks in Peru, where
GDP per capita grew steadily and poverty rates halved during the
2000s-2010s, but child and teenage labor rates remained high, especially
in rural areas. Preliminary results suggest that teenage labor responds
to trade shocks, but with heterogeneous effects across space depending
on how shocks are transmitted to teenagers. In places with lower access
to markets and high levels of home production, positive income shocks
are associated with lower reductions or increases in the labor
participation of teenagers, as their work opportunity cost increases.
These results are analyzed through a model in which schooling, teenage
labor, and occupational choice respond to wage growth, household
production opportunities, and idiosyncratic risk.