Ph.D. Candidate in Economics University of Michigan 2026–27 Job Market Candidate
I focus on questions that sit within the union of macroeconomics and
international trade. I use both structural and empirical tools to study
how globalization, domestic frictions, and government policy interact
with economic growth and distribution.
“Wealth Dynamics and Path Dependence” Latest
Draft
Abstract: I show that in an open economy, financial
constraints make the steady-state specialization depend on the initial
allocation of wealth across firms, and reduce the speed of adjustment
towards comparative advantage. In a dynamic multisector general
equilibrium model with heterogeneous entrepreneurs, each firm’s ability
to expand depends on market prices, persistent productivity shocks, and
its current wealth. As a result, sectoral production and growth depend
on how the distribution of wealth aligns with productivity. In a closed
economy, relative prices respond to local scarcity: when the most
productive entrepreneurs in a sector have lower levels of wealth, the
resulting lower supply increases the sector’s relative price and
accelerates wealth accumulation through higher profits, which allows the
sector to catch up. In an open economy, prices are instead tied to terms
of trade, and sectors favored by the initial wealth distribution grow
faster and larger. In a quantitative version of the model calibrated to
data from Peru, increasing borrowing limits to mimic US levels allows
the economy to approach its later sectoral output composition in
approximately five years, compared with fifteen years under Peruvian
financial conditions.
Other Current Research
“Government Spending Multipliers and Distribution of
Commodity Booms in the Spatial Economy” Latest Draft
(February, 2025) · RSIE
Discussion Paper 690Abstract
This paper studies the effects of local government spending and examines
an empirical puzzle: while income, wages, and household expenditure rise
following spending increases,local employment and firm value added do
not. I exploit plausibly exogenous variation in public investment
spending in Peru, where a commodity boom in the 2000s and ex ante
defined natural resource revenue-sharing rules generated resources
windfalls to local governments even to non-extractive provinces. Using
these transfers as an instrument for public investment purchases, I
estimate an open-economy relative local multiplier of 0.376. To explain
the disconnect between rises in wages, expenditures, and income gains,
and no response in local production, I propose a spatial transmission
mechanism: government spending raises local demand, which is met through
trade with other regions rather than only local production. I formalize
this mechanism in a spatial trade model, where local fiscal shocks
propagate through goods market linkages. The model’s equilibrium
conditions map to a Spatial Auto-Regressive (SAR) specification, which I
estimate to quantify indirect effects. The SAR results confirm that
trade spillovers substantially amplify the aggregate effects of local
spending. These findings imply that local multiplier estimates, which do
not incorporate spatial propagation, likely understate the broader
economic impact of fiscal policy.
“Teenage Labor, Trade, and Market Access” Preliminary Results Available by
RequestAbstract
This paper studies how, due to incomplete markets and limited
labor-market access, child and teenage labor can remain persistent
during periods of rapid aggregate growth The paper combines household
survey data with district-level exposure to trade shocks in Peru, where
GDP per capita grew steadily and poverty rates halved during the
2000s-2010s, but child and teenage labor rates remained high, especially
in rural areas. Preliminary results suggest that teenage labor responds
to trade shocks, but with heterogeneous effects across space depending
on how shocks are transmitted to teenagers. In places with lower access
to markets and high levels of home production, positive income shocks
are associated with lower reductions or increases in the labor
participation of teenagers, as their work opportunity cost increases.
These results are analyzed through a model in which schooling, teenage
labor, and occupational choice respond to wage growth, household
production opportunities, and idiosyncratic risk.